HEAD TO HEAD
Workable vs Greenhouse: which ATS wins?
Affiliate link · how we make money
THE SHORT ANSWER
Workable wins for scaling teams that want strong sourcing without an enterprise contract, from ~$299/mo. Greenhouse wins for enterprises needing structured hiring and the largest integration marketplace, at a far higher (custom) price. Buy by company size.
Side-by-side specs
| Workable | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Index Score | 86/100 | ✓ 89/100 |
| Ease of use | ✓ 8.4/10 | 7.6/10 |
| Price from | ✓ $299/mo | From ~$6k/yr |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Pricing model | Flat-rate tiers | Custom pricing |
| Highlight | 400M candidate DB | 500+ integrations |
| Sourcing & DB | ✓ Yes | No |
| Integrations & API | Yes | Yes |
| Branded career site | Yes | Yes |
Round by round
Pipeline & ease of use Winner: Workable
Workable has the more intuitive pipeline (8.4 vs 7.6 for ease of use).
Price Winner: Workable
Workable is cheaper to start ($299/mo vs From ~$6k/yr). Confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Sourcing & reach Winner: Greenhouse
Greenhouse has the stronger sourcing and candidate reach.
Collaboration & reporting Winner: Greenhouse
Greenhouse offers deeper collaboration and reporting.
FAQ
Is Workable better than Greenhouse?
Workable wins for scaling teams that want strong sourcing without an enterprise contract, from ~$299/mo. Greenhouse wins for enterprises needing structured hiring and the largest integration marketplace, at a far higher (custom) price. Buy by company size.
Workable vs Greenhouse: which is cheaper?
Workable is cheaper to start, from $299/mo versus From ~$6k/yr. Pricing is approximate — confirm on each vendor's site.
Workable vs Greenhouse: which is easier to use?
Workable scored higher for ease of use in our editorial assessment (8.4 vs 7.6 out of 10).
MORE MATCHUPS