HEAD TO HEAD
Ashby vs Greenhouse: which ATS wins?
Affiliate link · how we make money
THE SHORT ANSWER
Ashby wins for scaling teams that want one product for ATS, CRM and best-in-class analytics. Greenhouse wins for large enterprises that need structured hiring rigour and 500+ integrations. Pick Ashby for data, Greenhouse for process and scale.
Side-by-side specs
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Index Score | ✓ 90/100 | 89/100 |
| Ease of use | ✓ 7.8/10 | 7.6/10 |
| Price from | ✓ $400/mo | From ~$6k/yr |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
| Highlight | ATS + CRM + analytics | 500+ integrations |
| Sourcing & DB | ✓ Yes | No |
| Integrations & API | Yes | Yes |
| Branded career site | No | ✓ Yes |
Round by round
Pipeline & ease of use Winner: Ashby
Ashby has the more intuitive pipeline (7.8 vs 7.6 for ease of use).
Price Winner: Ashby
Ashby is cheaper to start ($400/mo vs From ~$6k/yr). Confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Sourcing & reach Winner: Greenhouse
Greenhouse has the stronger sourcing and candidate reach.
Collaboration & reporting Winner: Ashby
Ashby offers deeper collaboration and reporting.
FAQ
Is Ashby better than Greenhouse?
Ashby wins for scaling teams that want one product for ATS, CRM and best-in-class analytics. Greenhouse wins for large enterprises that need structured hiring rigour and 500+ integrations. Pick Ashby for data, Greenhouse for process and scale.
Ashby vs Greenhouse: which is cheaper?
Ashby is cheaper to start, from $400/mo versus From ~$6k/yr. Pricing is approximate — confirm on each vendor's site.
Ashby vs Greenhouse: which is easier to use?
Ashby scored higher for ease of use in our editorial assessment (7.8 vs 7.6 out of 10).